sqbr: (up)
[personal profile] sqbr posting in [community profile] access_fandom
First: Is there anyone here who uses tumblr and benefits significantly from image/video descriptions? I've been making a small effort to champion them, but apart from the sorts of things that apply intermittently to everyone (A video blocked at your work or country, comics with tiny text etc) my arguments have all been about hypothetical users and it would be useful to (a)Have some evidence against the "but noone who needs descriptions would use a visual medium like tumblr" argument(*) and (b)Get any specific suggestions you guys might have to offer (like: given the fact that long descriptions are often cut off automatically or by rebloggers, is it better to do short ones? Or do you lose too much information?)

Second: With my fanart I've been pitching my descriptions at people who are familiar with canon unless I have some particular reason to think it will be interesting to those who aren't. In general I find writing descriptions quite mentally taxing and, beyond mentioning the names of the characters and canon so that people can google if they like, trying to imagine how to make the image make sense to someone who doesn't know canon without going into a three page backstory is usually too much for me. But since I don't really use image descriptions myself I worry I may be missing something.

To give an example: Unless you're familiar with Homestuck, Redglare holds the chin of an angry looking Mindfang does not get across the fact that they are both grey skinned troll women with orange horns and specific outfits. But if you're not familiar with Homestuck, would you care?

Also, do people have any general good posts explaining the importance of image descriptions and best way to do them? I found So, Like, What’s The Big Deal With Transcripts and Stuff, Anyway? which I thought was pretty good (I've seen many good posts before but seem not to have saved them because I am silly) I also found 6 Surprising Bad Practices That Hurt Dyslexic Users which is somewhat relevant.

EDIT: Thanks for your feedback everyone, I've made a follow up post on my tumblr.

(*)There are many good theoretical counterexamples to this, such as users who are there for the text posts or have issues with text at certain colours/sizes/fonts so are fine with pictures but not comics etc. Plus of course users who can see fine but can't hear videos etc. But proof that such tumblr users exist would be useful, if only so that people have to come up with a different excuse for not doing descriptions.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-03-05 02:41 pm (UTC)
meloukhia: Sean Connery as James Bond, wearing a white shirt and tie, a cigarette dragging from his lip, pointing a gun. (James Bond)
From: [personal profile] meloukhia
I get private notes in my ask box from users thanking me for image descriptions; not just blind folks but also people who sometimes have trouble parsing the content of images.

I think also that it serves another function: It reminds people who would not otherwise be aware of it that web accessibility is an issue and they should care about it. At least once a day I see a post explaining what/why image descriptions are in response to an 'ask.' I *think* I may have been the person who started doing it on Tumblr (happy to be corrected if I'm not) and I noticed that it spread like wildfire and is becoming increasingly common (I'm still lobbying Tumblr to allow people to alt tag their images, it is ridiculous that this isn't a feature). And I note that, for example, people who weren't using alt tags on their personal sites now *are* because they saw it discussed on Tumblr.

I'm also (ahem) the person who wrote 'So, Like...' so I'm glad you like it!

April 2017

910 1112131415

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags