 | jadelennox ( jadelennox) wrote in access_fandom, @ 2011-10-11 10:10 am UTC |
| Current mood: | accomplished |
I often see people whose goal is to be helpful and promote good, accessible design stating that one of the most important things when writing accessible HTML is to use <strong> and <em> instead of <b> and <i>. While using semantically meaningful tags is important to write semantically correct HTML,
it has no effect on accessibility. In practice, no screenreaders distinguish between <strong> and <b> or <em> and <i>. Again, it's not a bad thing from a semantically correct HTML point of view, but it won't help your readers with disabilities.
I love the clearly written
articles about accessibility at the WebAIM site, which talk in simple terms about not just procedures but principles. I suggest that everyone who cares about making more accessible fandom web resources take some article on that site when you have a free 5 minutes and read it. Any article that interests you. "
Writing appropriate alternative text" might be particularly apropos to the questions many people have asked, because alternative text is an art, not a science.