Accessibility myths
Tue, Oct. 11th, 2011 10:10 amI often see people whose goal is to be helpful and promote good, accessible design stating that one of the most important things when writing accessible HTML is to use <strong> and <em> instead of <b> and <i>. While using semantically meaningful tags is important to write semantically correct HTML, it has no effect on accessibility. In practice, no screenreaders distinguish between <strong> and <b> or <em> and <i>. Again, it's not a bad thing from a semantically correct HTML point of view, but it won't help your readers with disabilities.
I love the clearly written articles about accessibility at the WebAIM site, which talk in simple terms about not just procedures but principles. I suggest that everyone who cares about making more accessible fandom web resources take some article on that site when you have a free 5 minutes and read it. Any article that interests you. "Writing appropriate alternative text" might be particularly apropos to the questions many people have asked, because alternative text is an art, not a science.
I love the clearly written articles about accessibility at the WebAIM site, which talk in simple terms about not just procedures but principles. I suggest that everyone who cares about making more accessible fandom web resources take some article on that site when you have a free 5 minutes and read it. Any article that interests you. "Writing appropriate alternative text" might be particularly apropos to the questions many people have asked, because alternative text is an art, not a science.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 04:48 pm (UTC)jadelennox, thank you for those links. The one about alt text is especially helpful.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 03:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 04:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-11 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-13 02:27 am (UTC)the <cite> tag: use this instead of <i> or <em> for the titles of books, articles, music etc (within the rules of one's style guide, of course). Follows the basic "the more markup reflects structure, the better" rule. If <cite> is used consistently, readers can separate research sources from random words, phrases, and names.
the <blockquote> tag: sighted readers recognize block quotes by changes in type, margins, and/or line spacing. (It seems that most DW styles handle blockquotes uniquely, so I can't make any prediction how it appears to you. I do know that readers using voice output or large print miss that implied information. For my writing, I've developed the following string (I used Typinator on my Mac to insert it when needed.)
<blockquote><small><i>begin quote</i> </small>CLIPPED TEXT HERE<small> <i>quote ends</i></small></blockquote>
Here's a sample (from a random "lemon chicken" SGA fanfic, of course):
Yes, I'm making the start and end of the blockquote specific. I'm literal-minded that way.