Survey about future disability big bang
Sat, Nov. 10th, 2012 04:18 amIn the coming months, I'm planning on hosting a big bang challenge dedicated to characters with disabilities. That is, characters with canonical (or arguably canonical) disabilities. No disability AUs here. Rather than give able-bodied characters disabilities and imagine "what if?" this challenge would put the focus on actually disabled characters and what it's like for them to do various plotty (or porny) things while disabled. This challenge is about giving disabled characters the attention they didn't get in canon. For participants working on original fic, this challenge is about making room for disabled characters in their canon.
Before this gets started, I'd like to gauge interest, and, more importantly, see how I can make this big bang more successful, accessible, and engaging than big bangs of the past. And for that I need folks to please answer this short survey.
If you have any questions/thoughts/ideas, I'd love to hear from you in the comments.
Before this gets started, I'd like to gauge interest, and, more importantly, see how I can make this big bang more successful, accessible, and engaging than big bangs of the past. And for that I need folks to please answer this short survey.
If you have any questions/thoughts/ideas, I'd love to hear from you in the comments.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 03:45 pm (UTC)Question: Does it matter if canon doesn't specify the exact nature of a character's disability? The one I'm thinking of uses a wheelchair or leg brace and cane to get around and has stated he hurt his leg in the war, but there's no further detail given. So I've seen fic writers come up with different explanations as to the exact nature of his disability.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-11 03:19 am (UTC)Because disability remains such a taboo topic (especially mental disabilities), I'd say it isn't necessary for the canon to explicitly state how a character is disabled. A lot of fictional texts aren't willing to go into the nature of a wheelchair user's disability beyond saying, "He fell down." Fic is an opportunity to flesh out the portrayal of that character and their disability.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-11 07:51 am (UTC)"A lot of fictional texts aren't willing to go into the nature of a wheelchair user's disability beyond saying, "He fell down." "
Very true - and to be fair on this canon... none of the characters get that much story. (It's the Danger Days stuff, if that means anything to you. If not, it's a fictional world My Chemical Romance created for their most recent album. In universe there's a DJ who shows up in the videos and as a promo, hosted a radio show where he played the album in full. So he's technically a minor character but gets more speaking time than any of the main ones - and in the main videos we see him in a wheelchair, in the promo he's seated and playing around with his cane. So he's very clearly disabled.
(Uh. It's possible I have many feelings about this character because he appeared just as I was dealing with being a disabled person and realising that most authors/filmmakers/etc didn't think there was a place for "people like me" in the post-apocalyptic stories I love. Then this universe showed up howed up and it was just "Here's this guy, doing his job" - and disabled.)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 05:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 06:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 08:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-10 10:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-11 09:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 12:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-12 07:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-13 04:54 am (UTC)Do you accept fics featuring characters with fantastic disabilities? I.e., disabilities like lycanthropy or baleful polymorphism?
What about fics where the character isn't disabled for the whole fic, because the character acquires a disability during the fic or is cured during the fic?
What about fics where the disability is implied by canon, but never portrayed at all? For instance, if, halfway through the third installment of a series, the main character mentions that something has made him feel better, in a context that implies that he means less affected by a certain unpleasant magic, but before that never mentioned that the unpleasant magic thing was causing any kind of pain or was even detectable, would interpreting that as the character having had chronic pain count as a canon disability?
What about disability AUs with characters who were disabled in canon? Either adding to the disabilities (so they have the canon one and more) or different disabilities instead of the ones they have canonically?
It does sound like a good idea! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2012-11-14 06:48 pm (UTC)Yes, as long as these fics explore/address to some degree what it's like to have a fantastic disability or to be disabled in a fantastic setting.
What about fics where the character isn't disabled for the whole fic, because the character acquires a disability during the fic or is cured during the fic?
I'd like to have the characters be disabled throughout the entire fic with exceptions being made for characters who canonically acquire their disabilities after they are born and/or end up being cured in the canon. In such cases, the character should be disabled for most of the fic.
What about fics where the disability is implied by canon, but never portrayed at all?
Yep, but I'd encourage author's to think about the role the implied disability has in the character's arch and characterization as well as how the disability was implied. Was it just one reference that could refer to a (very) temporary or one-off physiological/mental issue? Or a reference that illuminates a bit of how the character is portrayed? Or multiple references that make up (at least partially) the fabric of the character and/or their plot? For example, Captain Kirk mentions that Dr. McCoy gave him a sleeping pill last week--which is likely a one-time thing (not a disability) given Kirk never really talks about or is shown having sleeping problems outside that one reference. However, although the word "Asperger's" is only mentioned once in reference to Sherlock (from the BBC program) and Abed (from Community), being on the autism spectrum is a considerable part of their characters. I hope this makes sense.
What about disability AUs with characters who were disabled in canon? Either adding to the disabilities (so they have the canon one and more) or different disabilities instead of the ones they have canonically?
No.
Hope this helps!