Cosplay Ethics

Sat, Jun. 11th, 2011 12:22 am
ambrmerlinus: Portrait of a young white man with a flowing blond mohawk, in profile. (Default)
[personal profile] ambrmerlinus posting in [community profile] access_fandom
Here on the recommendation of [personal profile] dorothean to propose an idea and ask for advice.

I am giving serious consideration to cosplaying Tavros from the webcomic Homestuck. There are a few logistical problems (mainly, how am I going to make those horns? and get them to stick on my head?), but those can be overcome with time, hard work, and ingenuity. What is really bothering me are the ethical problems.

Tavros is a wheelchair user.

I am not a wheelchair user.

And I really, REALLY don't want to hurt or upset anyone with my cosplay.

Logistically, it is no problem. I have the wheelchair. It is sitting in my living room as we speak. I can reach out and touch it right now.* But still: ethics.

There are several ways I could circumvent this issue. I could portray Tavros from the pre-wheelchair-using point in his canon, but that's such a small slice of the story and it honestly feels like a cop-out. (As in, the only time he is shown in the webcomic as a non-wheelchair-user is when they are explaining how he became a wheelchair user in the first place. Very quick flashback, not really the character as he is best known.)

I could also be Tavros in his post-wheelchair-using incarnation. (He gets robotic legs. The whole situation is problematic at best and disturbing at worst.) While I could conceivably make robotic legs with the magic of the aforementioned time+work+ingenuity equation, again, most of the webcomic deals with wheelchair-using Tavros, not pre-wheelchair-using or robo-legs Tavros.

Alternatively, one could argue that since cosplay is done for fun and not profit, I am not hurting anyone by pretending to be a character who uses a wheelchair. (Unlike, say, the Glee casting department, who went with a non-wheelchair-using actor for a wheelchair-using character and my God does it show in the choreography.) But this feels like misdirection to me, as in, "Okay I might be doing something objectionable but at least I'm not doing something worse like those guys!" Total cop-out, not cool.

I am telling you all this in the hopes of sparking some conversation, getting some feedback from a variety of sources outside my own head, and perhaps talking to people who have confronted this issue in the past and may have some advice.

So... thoughts?

---

*Why do I have a wheelchair on hand if I am not a wheelchair user? Short version: My roommate is the president of my school's theater company. The company puts on a production of The Rocky Horror Picture Show every year, and they own a wheelchair for that purpose. I borrowed the wheelchair to do some amateur accessibility testing on my campus... annnd I have yet to return it. They don't need it until September, I'm sure it will be fine.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-11 08:04 am (UTC)
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)
From: [personal profile] jackandahat
I'm not a wheelchair user, I'm a cane user, so take my opinion with a big pinch of salt.

I think as long as you're aware that a) it's sensitive territory, and b) You don't suddenly know all about being a wheelchair user just because you sat in one for a while, I think it's OK. (Please, for the love of toast, no "OMG this opened my eyes!" posts afterwards. I've seen them, they're never pretty!)

From what you're saying it sounds like being a wheelchair user is a part of the character. I think taking that away could be more awkward, because it could come across as wheelchair-using characters being too awkward to play, too problematic.

But again - I'm disabled but I'm not a wheelchair user, so.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-11 08:35 am (UTC)
aron_kristina: Garbo being fab! (Default)
From: [personal profile] aron_kristina
Somewhat OT, but better to have one's eyes opened (for a certain definition of opened, of course) than what happened to a friend of mine when she was trying to show a guy how going blind was, and he replied with "that is so cool!"

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-11 08:39 am (UTC)
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)
From: [personal profile] jackandahat
This is true. I've just had way too many run-ins with people who were either very temporarily disabled, or acting for whatever reason, and have decided this means they know all. I'm not accusing the OP of this at all, it's just a concern.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-06-11 11:56 am (UTC)
jackandahat: A brown otter, no text. (Default)
From: [personal profile] jackandahat
Good. You didn't seem like the type, just for the fact you actually asked people's opinions, but I've had some run-ins with folk.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
45678 910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags