jesse_the_k: Ultra modern white fabric interlaced to create strong weave (interdependence)
[personal profile] jesse_the_k

Virtual Conference, CART provided, runs on two Wednesdays

Considers the intersections of disability, media, and communication across mediums, contexts, and geographies.

Detailed conference schedule at https://tinyurl.com/disabilitycommunication

These presentations, on the first Wednesday, seemed relevant to our community:

  • Building Microworlds for Difference on an Online Platform for Disability and Activist Arts
  • Crip Digital Intimacies: The Social Dynamics of Creating Access through Digital Technology
  • Affirming or ableist? Digital disconnection meets disability media studies

Free registration at https://ntu-sg.zoom.us/meeting/register/kooFlAjJTXiwER7TMZsO-g

jesse_the_k: ASL handshapes W T F (WTF)
[personal profile] jesse_the_k

[twitter.com profile] MerylKEvans is a Deaf digital marketing professional — she’s been online since 1993, and she’s been on countless video calls. Here’s her take on the best in automatic speech recognition-driven captions, as of 22 April 2020:

https://meryl.net/best-automatic-captioning-tool-for-video-calls

Sadly, there’s no handy tl;dr recommendation.

For one-on-one calls, Meryl — who speaks for herself and describes herself as a strong lipreader — had the best luck with Google Meet. She dives deep into the vexed question of how to get a meeting’s audio directed to the captioning software when you’ve plugged in your microphone to participate in the meeting.

For autocaptioning video events, there’s no clear winner as summarized at the end of Meryl’s article.

Meryl mentions this site spun up in response to the pandemic by two professionals who rely on captioning. They also declare no winner, while providing lots of links to more resources.

http://connect-hear.com/article-categories/captioning

Meryl’s made hundreds of YouTube videos, including this pungent 42-second opinion on whether autocaptions are better than none:

https://youtu.be/ukJfzPdiHB8

YouTube embed and transcript )

jesse_the_k: Ultra modern white fabric interlaced to create strong weave (interdependence)
[personal profile] jesse_the_k
[personal profile] jenett is narrating the process of access planning for an upcoming con over in the [community profile] accessibility_fail community.

One element she's working on is real-time captioning, abbreviated as CART or RTC. SF/F cons provide a peculiarly challenging environment for real-time captioning: we tend to all talk at once; we talk over each other; we use plenty of made-up words, names, and acronyms; and our discussions swoop unpredictably between grade-school humor and post-doc details (sometimes in one sentence).

CART is created by a highly trained steno-captionist (court reporter) who uses a chording keyboard to transcribe what speakers say, sound for sound. Computer software translates this into text, which is projected on a screen behind the speaker. This phonic-based system means that CART transcribers do best when they can program in names, neologisms, and acronyms in advance. Without that advance prep, ER SUE LA LUG WIN and I SACK AS HIM OFF might be showing up in a panel discussion. On the plus side, the CART transcript is verbatim, which creates a good record of the event.

There's another approach to text-based transcription: "meaning for meaning" or "m4m" systems. At present there are two in the U.S.: TypeWell and C-PRINT. Both provide online training which prepares a transcriber in 60 hours or less. The transcriber uses a standard laptop with extensive abbreviation-expansion software, and basically liveblogs the event. The same concerns arise with personal names; the finished transcript is briefer and hopefully meatier. RTC stenocaptionists earn a minimum of $120/hour; TypeWell transcribers start at around $50/hour.

You can read a spirited discussion of the pros and cons of CART and TypeWell in the college classroom at Deafness section at About.com. Jamie Berke has been editing this section for decades, and she totally knows her stuff.

Finally, here's a good elevator overview of the assistive technologies most helpful for people who have hearing impairments.

Sign language interpreters is a whole 'nother post.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
111213141516 17
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags